Choosing among the best zero-turn mowers depends on what you need the machine to do: cover a broad lawn efficiently, avoid gas-engine upkeep, or reach steep ground without riding on it. The Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ leads this group for buyers who want a larger stated mowing capacity and a six-battery package. The EGO Power+ Z6 is a more compact electric riding option with a 42-inch deck, adjustable blade speed, and a defined per-charge capacity. For slopes, the INFRONT tracked mower and Tyzar TYZ-550 take a different approach: both are remote-controlled, gas-powered machines with crawler tracks.
Get garden gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
These picks are not direct substitutes. The electric riders are built around seated mowing across lawns, while the tracked models are controlled from a distance and emphasize uneven terrain. I’ve ranked them by how clearly their supplied specifications fit common zero-turn mowing needs, and by how much useful information is available to judge their tradeoffs. Battery capacity sets a practical limit for the electric picks; the tracked options trade mowing width and riding convenience for slope-oriented control.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- Greenworks states a mowing capacity of up to 2.5 acres and includes six 8.0Ah batteries, giving it the broadest stated acreage fit among the two electric riding mowers here.
- The EGO Z6 has a 42-inch deck and cuts up to 1.5 acres per charge with its included batteries; its 10 cutting-height settings and three drive modes offer more specified adjustment detail.
- INFRONT and Tyzar are remote-controlled, gas-powered tracked machines for slope work, rather than conventional seated electric riders for covering large lawns.
- INFRONT specifies a 21.7-inch cutting width and remotely adjustable cutting height; Tyzar specifies twin mulching blades and a maximum slope of 45 degrees.
- Choose the electric Greenworks or EGO for routine lawn mowing without oil and spark-plug service; choose a tracked pick only if remote control and difficult terrain matter more than deck width.
| Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ Zero-Turn Mower with Six 8.0Ah Batteries and 600W Charger |  | Best Overall for Broad-Lawn Electric Mowing | Power: 60V battery | Mower type: Zero-turn riding mower | Mowing capacity: Up to 2.5 acres | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| EGO Power+ Z6 42-Inch Zero-Turn Electric Riding Lawn Mower (ZT4214L) |  | Best for Adjustable Electric Riding | Model: ZT4214L | Deck width: 42 inches | Power source: EGO 56V ARC Lithium batteries | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| INFRONT Remote Control Gas-Powered Lawn Mower with All-Terrain Tracks |  | Best for Remote Mowing on Steep Ground | Engine: 9 HP, 225 cc gasoline | Starting: Electric start | Drive: Rubber tracks; zero-turn differential drive | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Tyzar TYZ-550 Remote-Controlled Gas Track Lawn Mower |  | Best for Mulching on Slopes | Model: TYZ-550 | Engine: 224 cc gas | Drive system: Rubber crawler tracks | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| zero-turn mower | Cutting height | Blade speed | Model | Engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ Zero | — | 17,000 ft/min | — | — |
| EGO Power+ Z6 42-Inch Zero-Tur | 10 settings, 1.5–4.5 inches | 2,300–3,200 RPM | ZT4214L | — |
| INFRONT Remote Control Gas-Pow | 0.79–5.91 inches, remotely adjustable | — | — | 9 HP, 225 cc gasoline |
| Tyzar TYZ-550 Remote-Controlle | 1.1–5.9 inches, remotely adjustable | — | TYZ-550 | 224 cc gas |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ Zero-Turn Mower with Six 8.0Ah Batteries and 600W Charger
The Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ is my lead pick for buyers who want a conventional electric zero-turn rider and need more stated coverage than the EGO Z6 provides. Greenworks lists mowing capacity of up to 2.5 acres, compared with EGO’s up to 1.5 acres per charge. That difference makes Greenworks the stronger fit on paper for a larger lawn, though acreage claims should not be read as guaranteed runtime in every grass and terrain condition.
Its package includes six 8.0Ah batteries and a 600W charger. The mower is also listed at speeds up to 8 mph, matching the EGO’s stated maximum, and a blade speed of 17,000 ft/min. For buyers already invested in Greenworks equipment, battery compatibility with more than 75 Greenworks 60V tools can make the battery set useful beyond mowing. LED lights and a rear storage bin add practical convenience, but they do not change the core decision: this is a battery-powered rider whose mowing session depends on its charged pack.
Compared with the EGO, Greenworks offers a larger stated acreage figure, while EGO provides a specified 42-inch deck and more detail about cutting-height settings and drive modes. Greenworks’ description does not give a deck width or explain attachment compatibility beyond a general reference, so buyers who need those details should verify them before choosing. This pick also requires more planning around charge availability than a gas machine. For a large lawn and an existing Greenworks tool collection, the package has the clearest fit in this roundup; for steep slopes that call for remote operation, the tracked INFRONT and Tyzar machines serve a different purpose.
Pros:- Stated capacity of up to 2.5 acres is higher than the EGO’s listed 1.5 acres per charge.
- Includes six 8.0Ah batteries and a 600W charger.
- Runs at speeds up to 8 mph and includes LED lights.
- Batteries are compatible with more than 75 Greenworks 60V tools.
Cons:- Mowing time depends on battery charge and conditions.
- The supplied details do not specify deck width or list compatible attachments.
Best for: Homeowners with a broad lawn who want an electric riding mower and can plan mowing around battery charge.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a stated deck width, confirmed attachment list, or remote control for steep and uneven ground.
- Power:60V battery
- Mower type:Zero-turn riding mower
- Mowing capacity:Up to 2.5 acres
- Mowing speed:Up to 8 mph
- Blade speed:17,000 ft/min
- Batteries included:Six 8.0Ah batteries
- Charger:600W
- Other features:LED lights; rear storage bin
- Battery compatibility:More than 75 Greenworks 60V tools
Our verdict“I’d choose the Greenworks for a larger lawn where an electric riding mower’s stated acreage and cross-compatible battery pack matter most.”
EGO Power+ Z6 42-Inch Zero-Turn Electric Riding Lawn Mower (ZT4214L)
The EGO Power+ Z6 is my pick for buyers who want a more fully specified electric rider and a 42-inch deck, even if its stated mowing capacity is lower than Greenworks’. With its included six 6.0Ah batteries, EGO lists up to 1.5 acres per charge. That makes the Greenworks the more convincing choice for a larger area on the figures provided, while the EGO gives buyers clearer information on deck width, cutting range, and control settings.
Three drive modes—Control, Standard, and Sport—let the operator choose how the mower responds, and adjustable blade speed offers another way to adapt mowing to conditions. The 10 cutting-height settings span 1.5 to 4.5 inches, useful for buyers who want a defined range of lawn-height options. Its maximum speed is 8 mph, the same listed top speed as Greenworks. The digital display and app connectivity provide additional operating information, though neither changes the battery constraint: a long job still depends on charge and available charging time.
Like Greenworks, the Z6 avoids routine oil, spark-plug, and air-filter changes, a meaningful ownership difference from the gas-powered INFRONT and Tyzar. The tradeoff is that EGO’s listed capacity is one acre below Greenworks’, and its battery warranty requires registration within 90 days. The stated mower warranty is five years or 300 hours, with up to five years for registered batteries and five years for the charger. I’d favor it when the 42-inch deck and detailed adjustments are more useful than the extra stated acreage Greenworks offers. Buyers mowing steep terrain from a safe distance should instead compare the two tracked machines.
Pros:- 42-inch deck and cutting capacity of up to 1.5 acres per charge with included batteries.
- Three drive modes and adjustable blade speed.
- 10 cutting-height settings from 1.5 to 4.5 inches.
- Electric power avoids routine oil, spark-plug, and air-filter changes.
Cons:- Listed per-charge capacity is lower than Greenworks’ stated 2.5 acres.
- Battery warranty coverage requires registration within 90 days.
Best for: Owners who want an electric riding mower with a specified 42-inch deck, multiple drive modes, and several cutting adjustments.
Not ideal for: Buyers with lawns beyond its stated per-charge capacity or those who need remote slope mowing.
- Model:ZT4214L
- Deck width:42 inches
- Power source:EGO 56V ARC Lithium batteries
- Included batteries:Six 6.0Ah batteries
- Cutting capacity:Up to 1.5 acres per charge
- Maximum speed:8 mph
- Drive modes:Control, Standard, and Sport
- Blade speed:2,300–3,200 RPM
- Cutting height:10 settings, 1.5–4.5 inches
Our verdict“I’d pick the EGO Z6 for its specified deck and cutting adjustments when a 1.5-acre stated capacity suits the mowing plan.”
INFRONT Remote Control Gas-Powered Lawn Mower with All-Terrain Tracks
The INFRONT tracked mower makes sense when the problem is access and slope, rather than mowing a wide lawn quickly from a seat. Its rubber tracks and remote control are described for steep, varied terrain, with a stated maximum slope of 40–45 degrees. That puts it in a separate category from the Greenworks and EGO riders: those are better suited to broad lawn coverage from the operator seat, while INFRONT is designed to let the operator control mowing from a distance.
The narrower 21.7-inch cutting width is a clear tradeoff against the 42-inch EGO deck, and the supplied specifications give no acreage-per-hour figure. For a large, relatively open lawn, that makes the electric riders easier to justify. On sloped ground, however, the remote operation and tracked drive may be more relevant than deck width. The cutting height adjusts remotely across a stated 0.79 to 5.91 inches, though the listing does not explain adjustment increments. Dual alloy and manganese-steel blades are described as retracting after hard-object impact, and spare blades and a tool kit are included.
INFRONT uses a 9 HP, 225 cc gas engine with electric start. That avoids battery-runtime planning, but adds fuel and engine maintenance that neither electric rider needs. The remote’s operating range and battery details are not provided, so buyers cannot judge those parts of the operating setup from the listing alone. Compared with the Tyzar, INFRONT lists a similarly slope-focused tracked layout and a wider cutting-height range at the low end; Tyzar gives a specific 45-degree maximum slope and twin mulching blades. I’d choose INFRONT when retractable blades and the included maintenance accessories appeal, after confirming the remote system details that matter for the property.
Pros:- Rubber tracks and remote control are designed for steep, varied terrain.
- Specified maximum slope is 40–45 degrees.
- Cutting height adjusts remotely from 0.79 to 5.91 inches.
- Includes a tool kit and spare blades; blades are described as retracting on hard-object impact.
Cons:- Its 21.7-inch cutting width is much narrower than the EGO’s 42-inch deck.
- The gas engine requires fuel and maintenance.
- Remote operating range and control battery details are not provided.
Best for: Landowners who need remote-controlled mowing on steep or uneven ground and accept a narrower cut and gas-engine upkeep.
Not ideal for: Buyers mowing large, open lawns efficiently, or anyone who wants specified remote range and runtime details before purchase.
- Engine:9 HP, 225 cc gasoline
- Starting:Electric start
- Drive:Rubber tracks; zero-turn differential drive
- Maximum slope:40–45 degrees
- Cutting width:550 mm, approximately 21.7 inches
- Cutting height:0.79–5.91 inches, remotely adjustable
- Blades:Dual alloy/manganese steel; described as retractable on impact
- Accessories:Tool kit and spare blades
Our verdict“I’d consider the INFRONT for remote mowing on steep ground, provided its operating range and control setup fit the site.”
Tyzar TYZ-550 Remote-Controlled Gas Track Lawn Mower
The Tyzar TYZ-550 is another remote-controlled tracked gas mower, with an emphasis on uneven, wet, or sloped terrain. Its listed maximum slope is 45 degrees, a specific figure that matches the upper end of INFRONT’s stated range. Like INFRONT, it is aimed at ground where a conventional riding mower may not be the practical tool. Neither tracked machine offers the wide cutting deck of the EGO, and the Tyzar listing does not provide a cutting width, so I would not choose it for broad-lawn productivity based on the available specifications.
Its remotely adjustable cutting height runs from 1.1 to 5.9 inches, slightly less range at the low end than INFRONT’s 0.79-inch minimum. Tyzar lists twin manganese rebound blades that mulch clippings back into the lawn, which gives it a clearer stated clipping-management approach. Remote controls include start and stop and 360-degree rotation. That set of features favors buyers who value remote positioning and mulching on irregular ground; it does not resolve questions about remote operating range, cutting width, or expected coverage.
Compared with INFRONT, Tyzar gives a firm 45-degree slope rating and calls out mulching, while INFRONT specifies its 21.7-inch width, electric start, retractable blades, and included spare blades. Those details make INFRONT easier to evaluate for buyers who want a defined cutting width and blade-protection feature. Tyzar’s 224 cc gas engine still brings fuel and maintenance, unlike the battery-powered Greenworks and EGO. Its snow plow is described as optional, so I would not treat it as included equipment. This pick is most persuasive when the stated slope capability and mulching blades match a specific property need and the missing width and remote details can be confirmed.
Pros:- Crawler tracks are designed for uneven, wet, and sloped terrain.
- Lists a maximum slope of 45 degrees.
- Remote control includes start/stop and 360-degree rotation.
- Twin mulching blades return clippings to the lawn.
Cons:- The 224 cc gas engine requires fuel and maintenance.
- The supplied details do not list cutting width or remote operating range.
- The snow plow is optional rather than included.
Best for: Owners seeking a remote-controlled tracked mower for sloped or uneven ground who specifically want mulching blades.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a known cutting width, a broad-lawn rider, or a mower that avoids gas-engine upkeep.
- Model:TYZ-550
- Engine:224 cc gas
- Drive system:Rubber crawler tracks
- Maximum slope:45 degrees
- Cutting height:1.1–5.9 inches, remotely adjustable
- Blades:Twin manganese rebound mulching blades
- Control:Remote control with start/stop and 360° rotation
- Other equipment:Snow plow described as optional
Our verdict“I’d shortlist the Tyzar for remote slope mowing when mulching matters and its unspecified cutting width can be confirmed.”
How We Picked
I compared the four supplied product descriptions against the practical decisions a zero-turn mower buyer has to make: the type and size of ground to mow, cutting width or stated acreage, power source, control style, and the amount of operating detail available. I gave more weight to features that connect directly to a buyer outcome, such as the Greenworks acreage claim, EGO’s deck width and per-charge capacity, and the tracked models’ slope-oriented design.
The rankings reflect distinct use cases rather than a claim that every mower suits the same property. Greenworks ranks first because its included battery set and stated capacity make it the clearest broad-lawn electric package in this group. EGO follows as a capable electric rider with a narrower stated cutting capacity but more detail on deck size, cutting settings, and drive modes. INFRONT and Tyzar are ranked for a narrower task: remote mowing on sloped or uneven land. I compare those two on their listed cutting and terrain specifications, while treating missing details—such as remote operating range—as real limits on what a buyer can assess from the supplied information.
I have not treated these descriptions as proof of field performance. Claims such as acreage coverage, slope angle, and noise reduction are presented as stated product specifications. Actual runtime, cut quality, and slope handling can depend on grass, terrain, conditions, and setup. I also considered whether the listings explain maintenance and operating tradeoffs: electric machines avoid routine engine service, while both gas-powered tracked models require fuel and engine upkeep.
| zero-turn mower | Model | Blades |
|---|---|---|
| Greenworks 60V CrossoverZ Zero | — | — |
| EGO Power+ Z6 42-Inch Zero-Tur | ZT4214L | — |
| INFRONT Remote Control Gas-Pow | — | Dual alloy/manganese steel; described as retractable on impact |
| Tyzar TYZ-550 Remote-Controlle | TYZ-550 | Twin manganese rebound mulching blades |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Zero-turn Mowers
Before choosing a zero-turn mower, I’d match the machine to the property and the way you plan to operate it. These four options split into two groups: seated battery-powered riders for lawn coverage and remote-controlled gas track mowers for challenging terrain. The right comparison starts with that distinction, then moves to capacity, cut width, maintenance, and the specifications the listing actually provides.
Match the mower to the terrain
For a broad lawn that can be mowed from a seat, the Greenworks and EGO are the relevant choices. Their zero-turn riding format is intended for covering turf while steering around obstacles. The INFRONT and Tyzar are remote-controlled crawler-track machines. Their listed slope capabilities make them candidates for difficult ground, but that does not make them interchangeable with a wide-deck riding mower. If steep banks or uneven sections are the main concern, compare track design and remote control details; if most of the property is open lawn, look closely at deck width and stated mowing capacity.
Compare coverage and cutting width
Greenworks states capacity of up to 2.5 acres, while EGO lists up to 1.5 acres per charge with its included battery pack and gives a 42-inch deck width. Those figures help frame the electric riders, but they do not guarantee the same result on every lawn. Grass length, terrain, and mowing conditions can affect how much ground a charge covers. INFRONT specifies a 21.7-inch cutting width; Tyzar’s supplied details omit width. That smaller known width and missing figure matter if you are weighing either track mower against the faster coverage expected from a broad-deck rider.
Decide between battery and gas
The electric Greenworks and EGO avoid routine oil, spark-plug, and air-filter changes, but both depend on charged batteries. Greenworks includes six 8.0Ah batteries and EGO includes six 6.0Ah batteries; their stated acreage figures differ as well. Gas-powered INFRONT and Tyzar do not depend on a mower battery pack for cutting sessions, but their engines need fuel and maintenance. I’d weigh the charging plan against engine upkeep and choose based on which limitation fits your routine better.
Check adjustment and control details
EGO provides the clearest set of seated-rider controls here: three drive modes, adjustable blade speed, and 10 cutting-height settings from 1.5 to 4.5 inches. Greenworks lists up to 8 mph, blade speed, lights, and a storage bin, but not a deck width. For remote machines, INFRONT describes remotely adjustable height across 0.79 to 5.91 inches and retractable blades; Tyzar lists start/stop, 360-degree rotation, and remote height adjustment. Neither tracked listing supplies a remote operating range, so request that information if it affects safe operation on your property.
Treat slope claims and missing specifications carefully
INFRONT lists a maximum slope of 40–45 degrees and Tyzar lists 45 degrees. These are product claims, not a substitute for checking the manufacturer’s operating instructions for the ground, grass, and conditions on your property. The available descriptions also leave important questions unanswered: Tyzar’s cutting width is not given, INFRONT does not provide adjustment increments, and neither listing states remote range. Before choosing a track mower, confirm those details and any operating limits that affect your site.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which mower in this roundup has the highest stated lawn capacity?
Greenworks lists mowing capacity of up to 2.5 acres, compared with EGO’s up to 1.5 acres per charge using the included batteries. Those are stated figures, and actual coverage can vary with grass, terrain, and mowing conditions. Neither tracked mower has a comparable acreage figure in the supplied details.
Are the INFRONT and Tyzar zero-turn mowers like the Greenworks and EGO?
They all include zero-turn or turning capabilities in their descriptions, but they are different kinds of machines. Greenworks and EGO are seated electric riding mowers intended for lawn coverage. INFRONT and Tyzar are remote-controlled gas machines with crawler tracks, aimed at uneven or sloped ground. Their narrower or unspecified cutting widths make them less directly comparable for mowing a broad lawn.
Which electric mower should I choose, Greenworks or EGO?
I’d lean toward Greenworks when its stated capacity of up to 2.5 acres and compatibility with more than 75 Greenworks 60V tools are the strongest fit. EGO makes more sense when a specified 42-inch deck, three drive modes, and 10 cutting-height settings matter more, and its stated 1.5-acre per-charge capacity suits the job. Both require battery planning and avoid routine engine service.
Which option is intended for steep slopes?
Both INFRONT and Tyzar are described as tracked remote-controlled mowers for slope work. INFRONT lists a maximum slope range of 40–45 degrees, while Tyzar lists 45 degrees. Those figures should be checked against the manufacturer’s operating guidance and the conditions on your property; the listings do not provide remote operating range, a useful detail to confirm before purchase.
What maintenance tradeoff should I expect from these models?
The Greenworks and EGO are battery-powered and avoid routine oil, spark-plug, and air-filter changes, though you need to manage charging and battery runtime. INFRONT and Tyzar use gasoline engines, so they require fuel and engine maintenance. If you are choosing a tracked mower for terrain reasons, factor that upkeep into the decision alongside its remote operation and slope-focused design.
Conclusion
For a larger lawn and an electric riding mower, I’d start with the Greenworks because it has the highest stated acreage capacity in this group and includes six 8.0Ah batteries. For a buyer who values a defined deck width and a wider set of cutting adjustments, the EGO Z6 is the better specified choice, provided its stated per-charge capacity fits the property. If your main challenge is remote mowing on steep or uneven ground, compare INFRONT and Tyzar: INFRONT gives a cutting-width figure and retractable-blade detail, while Tyzar calls out mulching and a 45-degree maximum slope. Confirm their missing operating details before deciding. The best fit comes down to whether you need lawn coverage from a seat or a tracked machine you can control remotely.
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
